• About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Wholesome Area - Beauty Secrets and Tips
No Result
View All Result
  • Health Care
  • Health News
  • Healthy Advices
  • Well Being
  • Health Care
  • Health News
  • Healthy Advices
  • Well Being
No Result
View All Result
Wholesome Area - Beauty Secrets and Tips
No Result
View All Result
Home Health Care

Spotlight shifts to Medicaid, a make-or-break issue for Trump

by
April 14, 2025
in Health Care
0
Spotlight shifts to Medicaid, a make-or-break issue for Trump
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The adoption of the Republicans’ budget bill has thrown a spotlight onto the hot-button issue that could make or break President Trump’s domestic agenda: Medicaid. 

The massive government health care program is at the heart of the GOP’s plan to slash federal spending in order to trim deficits and make budget space for Trump’s new tax cuts. But the topic is dividing Republicans both within and between the chambers of Congress, where conservatives favor steep cuts to Medicaid, centrists say they’ll oppose any erosion of health benefits for their constituents, and GOP leaders are left straddling the gap in search of a compromise that can appease both camps. 

They have their work cut out for them. 

The 70-page budget plan approved by Republicans in both chambers contains few policy details, and it mentions Medicaid only once. But it instructs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, to locate $880 billion in spending cuts over the next decade. That’s mathematically impossible, the Congressional Budget Office says, without cutting Medicaid, which provides health coverage to more than 70 million people.

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and other GOP leaders maintain they can reach that number by weeding out waste, fraud and abuse in the program. But Democrats and many health care advocates disagree. And now that the GOP budget has been adopted, they’re vowing to take the Medicaid fight directly to voters — particularly in battleground GOP districts with high numbers of Medicaid patients. 

“Republicans can run from their proposal, which is the largest Medicaid cut in American history, but we will never allow them to hide,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters in the Capitol shortly after lower-chamber Republicans passed the budget bill. 

“Now that the committee process has been set in motion,” he continued, “they will have to spell out the very cuts to Medicaid and other programs that we have been making clear for weeks now they are determined to visit on the American people.”

As part of that effort, Democrats are hoping to exploit the sharp GOP divisions over the value of Medicaid and how deeply Republicans should cut its funding. That disagreement extends beyond the House to the Senate, where a handful of Republicans — including Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Susan Collins (Maine) and Josh Hawley (Mo.) — have warned that they won’t accept any Medicaid cuts as part of Trump’s tax-cut package. 

The prickly nature of the Republicans’ Medicaid debate was evident on the House floor in the midst of Thursday’s vote on the Senate-crafted budget blueprint that’s designed to guide Trump’s domestic priorities — not only tax cuts, but also an expansion of energy production and a crackdown on immigration — through Congress and on to the president’s desk later this year.

While most of the attention throughout that debate was on conservative spending hawks, who had publicly threatened to kill the resolution over concerns that it doesn’t cut spending deeply enough, moderates were more quietly sounding alarms from the center, warning party leaders that they’re prepared to oppose any final package that curtails Medicaid benefits in their districts. 

On the House floor during that vote, Johnson huddled in a lengthy discussion with some of those moderates in an effort to assure them that Medicaid benefits were not on the chopping block as GOP leaders move ahead with Trump’s “one big, beautiful bill.” 

Those voices want the final package to hew closer to the $4 billion in cuts the budget mandates for the Senate, and not the $1.5 trillion the same plan requires of the House. 

After the vote, some of those centrists said they were encouraged by comments delivered by Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) just a few hours earlier, when he declined to commit the upper chamber to the $1.5 trillion figure. But the moderates also emphasized that their vote for the final bill would hinge on Johnson’s ability to keep his word about leaving Medicaid benefits untouched.

“We made very clear, we won’t vote for something that takes away benefits from seniors, disabled and vulnerable people that we represent who rely on Medicaid,” Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) said. 

“We want to cut the fraud, waste and abuse, [and] I think there’s significant savings there we could achieve in this final bill [through] work requirements and taking illegal immigrants off of the rolls and cutting back on the actual abuse that we’re seeing,” she continued. “We will not do anything that’ll [erode] benefits. And the Speaker’s made that very clear, and the president’s made it very clear, that they agree with us.” 

Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), another GOP centrist, delivered a similar warning, saying he won’t support any legislation that cuts benefits under Medicaid, Medicare or Social Security.

“I have been in constant communication with House leadership and the Speaker, making it clear that any bill that threatens these critical programs will not get my support,” he said after Thursday’s vote. 

On the other side of the ideological spectrum, however, conservatives interpreted Thune’s comments very differently, saying they were newly convinced that the House and Senate were, for the first time, on the same page in seeking $1.5 trillion in cuts. Hitting that figure would rely deeply on the $880 billion charged to the Energy and Commerce Committee, which means Medicaid would necessarily be affected. 

Conservatives have, for decades, gone after Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, hammering the services provided by major entitlement programs as bloated and inefficient — and better left to the private sector. 

Those sentiments are spilling into the current debate over Medicaid, as some conservatives are unapologetic about going after the program — despite leadership’s claims to the contrary — and urging their colleagues to extend the effort beyond the hunt for waste, fraud and abuse.

“Some Republicans are afraid of something that has 80 percent support, which is [a] work requirement for able-bodied individuals who don’t have children. Why can’t those people go to work? The American people support that,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of just two Republicans who opposed the GOP budget, said after the resolution passed. 

“The liberals are calling that: ‘Oh, you’re cutting Medicaid,’” he added. “But our [Republican] colleagues really aren’t even doing that. And they should be.”

Mychael Schnell contributed reporting. 

Previous Post

Johnson: US must ‘eliminate people on Medicaid’ who are not ‘eligible to be there’

Next Post

Pfizer will end development of daily anti-obesity pill due to liver injury

Next Post
Pfizer will end development of daily anti-obesity pill due to liver injury

Pfizer will end development of daily anti-obesity pill due to liver injury

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Americans die younger in states with conservative policies: study

Americans die younger in states with conservative policies: study

October 27, 2022
Those at risk for severe COVID-19 often least likely to get monoclonal antibodies

Those at risk for severe COVID-19 often least likely to get monoclonal antibodies

April 26, 2022
Biden says US has offered vaccines to North Korea but got no response

Biden says US has offered vaccines to North Korea but got no response

May 21, 2022
In Alzheimer’s, DNA errors stress cells, create dysfunction

In Alzheimer’s, DNA errors stress cells, create dysfunction

April 26, 2022
HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

0
Authentic Doctors V/S Quacks: Do You Really Know the Difference?

Authentic Doctors V/S Quacks: Do You Really Know the Difference?

0
Top Picks for Meditation Location in the US for a Person with Disability

Top Picks for Meditation Location in the US for a Person with Disability

0
Treat Yourself at the Spa: 7 Health Benefits of Spa Treatments

Treat Yourself at the Spa: 7 Health Benefits of Spa Treatments

0
HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

July 9, 2025
Two summer COVID strains – Nimbus and Stratus – less severe than earlier strains: doctor

Two summer COVID strains – Nimbus and Stratus – less severe than earlier strains: doctor

July 9, 2025
Not all brands are onboard with ditching synthetic dyes

Not all brands are onboard with ditching synthetic dyes

July 9, 2025
Trump’s CDC nominee advances on party-line vote in Senate 

Trump’s CDC nominee advances on party-line vote in Senate 

July 9, 2025

Recent News

HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

HHS abruptly cancels preventive services task force meeting

July 9, 2025
Two summer COVID strains – Nimbus and Stratus – less severe than earlier strains: doctor

Two summer COVID strains – Nimbus and Stratus – less severe than earlier strains: doctor

July 9, 2025
Not all brands are onboard with ditching synthetic dyes

Not all brands are onboard with ditching synthetic dyes

July 9, 2025
Trump’s CDC nominee advances on party-line vote in Senate 

Trump’s CDC nominee advances on party-line vote in Senate 

July 9, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Health and Beauty Tips and Ideas





    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy

    Disclaimer: Wholesomearea.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized beauty advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give health advice or provide beauty recommendation. Any recommendations here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your doctor.
    © 2025 Wholesomearea.com. All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Health Care
    • Health Medicine
    • Health News
    • Healthy Advices
    • Well Being

    Disclaimer: Wholesomearea.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized beauty advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give health advice or provide beauty recommendation. Any recommendations here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your doctor.
    © 2025 Wholesomearea.com. All rights reserved.